Conservation Paradox – the pros and cons of recreational hunting – World News ReportPosted by On

endangered male lions remains a prime target of trophy hunters

Although endangered, male lions are prized by trophy hunters

a wild boar

Feral animals such as wild boar are widely hunted in Australia and elsewhere

a lone zebra - some species of zebra are facing population pressure

some species of zebra, such as the mountain zebra, are under pressure

Recreational hunting, especially of charismatic species as trophies, raises ethical and moral concerns, yet it can conserve nature and support livelihoods.

On the one hand, recreational hunting can reduce the number of individual animals in a population, whereas on the other, diverting land to priority hunting areas can in fact benefit entire ecosystems”

— Professor Corey Bradshaw

ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA, AUSTRALIA, February 19, 2021 /EINPresswire.com/ — In a new article published in the journal One Earth, scientists from the University of Helsinki in Finland and Flinders University in Australia have reviewed more than 1,000 studies on recreational hunting — the first such attempt to summarize the scientific literature examining the biodiversity and social effects of recreational hunting globally.

Co-lead author University of Helsinki Associate Professor Enrico Di Minin says while it might seem counterintuitive, there is evidence to suggest some recreational hunting can deliver environmental and social benefits.

University of Helsinki colleague and co-lead author Dr Hayley Clements says more analysis is needed to understand how and why recreational hunting can work for…

Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

endangered male lions remains a prime target of trophy hunters

Although endangered, male lions are prized by trophy hunters

a wild boar

Feral animals such as wild boar are widely hunted in Australia and elsewhere

a lone zebra - some species of zebra are facing population pressure

some species of zebra, such as the mountain zebra, are under pressure

Recreational hunting, especially of charismatic species as trophies, raises ethical and moral concerns, yet it can conserve nature and support livelihoods.

On the one hand, recreational hunting can reduce the number of individual animals in a population, whereas on the other, diverting land to priority hunting areas can in fact benefit entire ecosystems”

— Professor Corey Bradshaw

ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA, AUSTRALIA, February 19, 2021 /EINPresswire.com/ — In a new article published in the journal One Earth, scientists from the University of Helsinki in Finland and Flinders University in Australia have reviewed more than 1,000 studies on recreational hunting — the first such attempt to summarize the scientific literature examining the biodiversity and social effects of recreational hunting globally.

Co-lead author University of Helsinki Associate Professor Enrico Di Minin says while it might seem counterintuitive, there is evidence to suggest some recreational hunting can deliver environmental and social benefits.

University of Helsinki colleague and co-lead author Dr Hayley Clements says more analysis is needed to understand how and why recreational hunting can work for…



Source link

News

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.